McIntosh's behaviour showed he wasn't aware of RAM problems, Appeal Court told

McIntosh's behaviour showed he wasn't aware of RAM problems, Appeal Court told
Jonathan Underhill
By Jonathan Underhill Nov. 19 (BusinessDesk) - Former Ross Asset Management investor Hamish McIntosh wouldn't have continued to spend money on a property development in Wellington had he known the fund manager was in trouble, the Court of Appeal was told. In June, the High Court ruled that McIntosh must repay $454,000 in fictitious gains from his investment in RAM, extracted before it collapsed, but could keep his $500,000 principal payment. RAM liquidators John Fisk and David Bridgman of PwC sued McIntosh as a test case and have said the...