Product care: Why platforms are responsible in Australia (but not NZ)

Product care: Why platforms are responsible in Australia (but not NZ)
Platform operators in NZ are not subject to any licensed duty to take care of their investment products. (Image: Getty)
David Chaplin
Macquarie took its medicine in one swallow.Glugging back a A$321 million (NZ$364.2m) compensation agreement last week, the so-called “millionaires factory” admitted to, cough, “a contravention of its obligation to provide financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly” in regards to the collapsed Shield Master Fund.Shield blew up about A$480m invested by circa 5,800 Australians (mostly via superannuation accounts) in what turned out to be dodgy, possibly fraudulent, real estate and property development projects.The...

More Opinion

Demographic clock ticking faster
Opinion

Cameron Bagrie: Demographic clock ticking faster

Tsy's Long Term Statement on the Fiscal Position didn't shy away from the obvious.

Why NZ can’t just 'set and forget'
Opinion

Dileepa Fonseka: Why NZ can’t just 'set and forget'

Visions and dreams are thriving in the global south. Can we rediscover them too?

Dileepa Fonseka 29 Sep 2025
Investing: What Wall St is banking on
Opinion

Simon Robertson: Investing: What Wall St is banking on

Investors eye an upbeat finish as big tech and AI drive market growth.

Simon Robertson 27 Sep 2025